![]() ![]() You can start from this document: Visual Studio IDE documentation.Īnd For features like “Live Dependency Validation”, “Architectural Layer Diagrams” and “Architecture Validation”, you can refer to this document: Validate code with dependency diagrams.įor features like “IntelliTrace”, “Code Map Debugger Integration” and “.NET Memory Dump Analysis”, you can refer to these documents: IntelliTrace for Visual Studio Enterprise (C#, Visual Basic, C++), Use code maps to debug your applications and Collecting and analyzing memory dumps, and for “Snapshot Debugger” and “Time Travel Debugging (Preview)”, please refer to these documents: View Snapshots in Visual Studio 2017 Enterprise or above and Time Travel Debugging.įor features like “Live Unit Testing”, “IntelliTest”, “Microsoft Fakes (Unit Test Isolation)” and “Code Coverage”, you can refer to these documents: How to configure and use Live Unit Testing, How to: Generate unit tests by using IntelliTest, Isolate code under test with Microsoft Fakes and Use code coverage to determine how much code is being tested.įor features like “Embedded Assemblies”, “Xamarin Inspector” and “Xamarin Profiler”, please refer to these documents: Bundle Assemblies into Native Code, Xamarin Inspector and Xamarin Profiler.īesides, I will help to report your requirements to VS Product Team and try to update and improve the related documents(contents). But I’m afraid, for more detailed information about each feature, you need to refer to other single introduction documents. Having had a play, it's very easy to get used to.Īnd re-iterating my advice for the "it didn't work" part of your question, you should show us the code or the errors that you're getting - it may be blindingly obvious to us once we've seen them.Like David mentioned above, currently, the differences between Visual Studio Professional and Visual Studio Enterprise are listed here: Compare Visual Studio 2019 Editions. ![]() Eclipse was my favorite simply because I used to do a lot of Java at work and I'm familiar with it but everyone seems to rave about Code::Blocks for C++ work. If you're a beginner, you may need help setting them up for nice debugging or accessing Microsoft libraries but it's well worth it in my opinion. ![]() If you're more concerned with free-as-in-speech, then Dev C++, Code::Blocks, Eclipse CDT and others, are probably all excellent environments. I tend to use the VS2010 Professional package nowadays simply because MS goes out of their way to make it a polished product and I don't mind paying for it since I, in turn, get paid well for my work :-) It's basically the Microsoft IDE for learning purposes at zero cost and you'll find it a more polished product than the others - this is my opinion, others will argue otherwise and they may be right, that's why it's an opinion :-). If you really want to develop programs easily and you're less concerned with free-as-in-speech as opposed to free-as-in-beer software, get your hands on a copy of Visual C++ Express. Visual C++ will almost certainly make that an easily-configured option (or the default) but you'll probably have to work harder to achieve it in a non-MS product. ![]() I don't know what this is since I've never used Dev C++ but my first thoughts would be MFC or Win32 API calls.ĭev C++ should be able to link to the Microsoft libraries but you may need to configure that. However, standard C++ programs should compile and run in either so, if you're having troubles, it's likely because you're using some Microsoft-provided stuff that's not in Dev C++. See final two paragraphs for my suggestions. You touched upon one of the differences between MS Visual C++ and Dev C++ (and its cousins also using GCC under the covers). You need to show us the code, we can't offer any really specific advice without knowing more detail on what you're doing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |